A.Patrick Dundon, an
insulation contractor in Windsor, N.Y.,
responds: To perform at maximum R-value,
fiberglass batt insulation must be installed
perfectly. It has to be of consistent density
throughout the wall cavity, which means that every
piece must be cut to fill the cavity completely in
all three dimensions. If you can do that in every
building cavity, fiberglass batts will work as
labeled.
But installation perfection is hard to achieve.
For example, it’s common to see fiberglass
batts compressed in a wall cavity that’s
slightly too narrow. Most installers, rather than
trim a small amount of material along the edges,
will simply stuff the insulation into the cavity,
causing it to pinch at the edges and curl away from
the studs at the corners. Tests conducted by the
Oak Ridge National Laboratory several years ago
showed that if a pinched batt is rounded over at a
3/4-inch radius where it meets the studs in the
corners, its performance is reduced by 12
percent.
Keep in mind also that accepted test protocol
for insulation calls for an average temperature in
the test sample of 75°F, with
50° on one side and
100° on the other. Unfortunately,
that’s not a common scenario in the
exterior walls of houses. The test is also
conducted in such a way that it doesn’t
recognize the effect that air-convection loops
inside a wall cavity might have on the
insulation’s performance. In a real
house’s wall, you will most likely have
either 3 1/2 or 5 1/2-inch-deep wall cavities that
are at least 8 feet tall; the wall may experience
outside surface temperatures anywhere from
100°F to
–20°F and inside surface
temperatures from, say, 65°F to
72°F on the inner surface. When
the delta T, or temperature difference, across such
walls is high, there will be some convection even
in perfectly installed batts because the fiberglass
is not dense enough to stop the air movement. On a
very cold day, heat inside the house causes warm
air to rise in the wall cavity behind the face of
the drywall. On the outside of the wall, cold dense
air drops along the face of the sheathing. This
creates a convective loop in the wall that hastens
heat loss from inside, effectively degrading the
performance of the insulation. The effect is
magnified with increased temperature extremes and
increased wall height. This is why dense-pack
systems — either fiberglass or cellulose
— outperform fiberglass batts.
Some energy professionals use a system for
rating fiberglass batt installations. A
“good” rating means there are no
gaps, compressions, voids, or other imperfections.
“Fair” allows gaps of 2.5 percent
of the surface area, or about a 3/8-inch gap along
the edge of a 14 1/2-inch-wide batt.
“Poor” allows for voids of 5
percent of the surface — a 3/4-inch gap. A
chart posted at the Web site of the Building
Performance Institute attaches R-values to these
ratings (“Effective R-Values for Batt
Insulation,”
bpi.org/standards_reference.aspx). According to the
chart, a nominal 6-inch batt installed with a
“fair” rating has an effective
R-value of 11; installed “poor,”
its effective R-value is 4. Batt compression
— stuffing a batt into too small a cavity
— is also a critical error: A nominal R-19
batt manufactured to be used at 6 1/4-inch
thickness that is compressed into a 5 1/2-inch wall
cavity is rated “poor.”
When you decide which insulation to use, ask
yourself whether your crew (or your insulation
contractor) can install fiberglass batts perfectly
in every cavity, and whether your job budgets can
afford the extra level of supervision and labor
involved. This is the reason dense-pack fiberglass,
dense-pack cellulose, and spray-foam products are
gaining market share.