Overall Results
Attempting to rank tools after performing a variety of tests
can be tricky. We’ve dealt with it by grading on a curve.
We calculated the performance of each drill as a percentage of
the best tool in both the screw and spade bit tests. This meant
that the best drill in each test received a score of 100%.
Next, we took an average of both curved test scores to
determine the overall rating of each drill (see ).
Panasonic EY6230 15.6
V
Panasonic Industrial Tool
One Panasonic Way, 4A-3
Secaucus, NJ 07094
201/392-6655
Speed Range (low/high):
65-450/200-1,450
Max Torque (low speed/
high speed): 273/73
Weight: 5 lb., 2 oz.
Street Price: $200
Ryobi CTH1442K2
Ryobi America Corp.
1424 Pearman Dairy Rd.
Anderson, SC 29625
800/525-2579
www.ryobi.com
Speed Range (low/high):
0-350/0-1,300
Max Torque (low speed/
high speed): 300/92
Weight: 4 lb., 9 oz.
Street Price: $139
| Bosch 3615 S-B
Power Tools
4300 W. Peterson
Chicago, IL 60646
877/267-2499 www.boschtools.com
Speed Range (low/high):
0-400/0-1,420
Max Torque (low speed/
high speed): 250/80
Weight: 4 lb., 6.5 oz.
Street Price: $200
|
| Makita 6233D (NiMH)
Makita USA
14930 Northam Street
La Mirada, CA 90638
800/462-5482
Speed Range (low/high):
0-400/0-1,300
Max Torque (low speed/
high speed): 330/117
Weight: 4 lb., 8.5 oz.
Street Price: $280
|
| Metabo BEAT214/2
R+L Metabo
1231 Wilson Drive
West Chester, PA 19380
800/638-2264 www.metabo.com
Speed Range (low/high):
0-400/0-1,400
Max Torque (low speed/
high speed): 209/75
Weight: 5 lb., 11.5 oz.
Street Price: $300
|
Ratings. Only the Hitachi, powered
with the prototype NiMH 3Ah battery, scored above 90%. This is
somewhat misleading, however, because the same Hitachi drill,
when powered with its standard issue NiCad battery, scored only
70%. What this means is that the increased Hitachi runtime,
when using the prototype 3Ah battery, masked the mediocre
performance of the actual drill (minus the battery). To figure
out which drill (minus the batteries) performs best, results
from the NiCad powered models are the best indicator. Batteries
will change during the coming year, but drill design will
remain largely the same.
The DeWalt was the only NiCad powered drill to approach an
overall rating near 90%. Most of the drills, when running on
NiCad batteries, came in between 69% and 71%. Slightly behind
this group, Ryobi had a rating of 65%. This is noteworthy
because the Ryobi, at the low end of professional-quality
tools, costs $60 to $140 less than most other professional
drills, even though its performance drops off only slightly. At
current prices, you can buy two Ryobi drills for the price of
one Makita with NiMH batteries. But remember, don’t be
tempted to go buy the even cheaper homeowner units, because
their performance completely fails to meet the needs of a
professional.
Which drill you buy depends largely on what kind of work you
do and how much you’re willing to spend. DeWalt currently
makes the best overall 14.4-volt drill according to our tests.
But it is also one of the more expensive. Makita and Panasonic
also make good all-around models for both high- and low-torque
situations. For high-torque applications specifically, the
Makita NiMH and the Panasonic were good performers. Makita has
the added advantage of being the only manufacturer to currently
offer a NiMH battery option for its drill, which increases
runtime. For low-torque applications, the Hitachi and the
Milwaukee drills worked well.
Keep in mind that as NiMH batteries become available, they
will alter these recommendations. If you put a better battery
into the same drill, it will run longer. But remember, it will
not perform better in other respects. So, if you put the same
quality NiMH batteries into the current DeWalt drill as well as
the other currently available drills, the DeWalt will still be
that much better than the rest.
Who comes out with the best batteries, however, remains to
be seen. Many manufacturers will be introducing NiMH batteries
with 3Ah ratings during 1999. The promising Hitachi prototype
that we tested here is slated to be on the market by
mid-to-late 1999. How these new batteries perform will need to
be evaluated in the future.