Starting last spring, JLC has been following the work of the Southern California Builders Safety Alliance (SCBSA). The group’s members include many of the top production builders in the Southern California market, along with representatives from Cal/OSHA Consultation and from trade contractors in the area.

After several years in existence, SCBSA has evolved a systematic approach to its work, organized around a quarterly calendar. Each quarter, teams go into the field to inspect jobsites, with tablet computers to record their observations and with “Safety Mojo” spreadsheet software for organizing and tabulating the results. After discussing what the data reveals, the group chooses an area of focus for the quarter and conducts a formal training session on that topic for site superintendents, trade contractors, and employees.
Not every builder in the local market, it should be noted, is on board with the Safety Alliance’s efforts. Multiple builders are active in most area developments, and a superintendent with one SCBSA member builder told JLC that he often sees trade contractor employees walk across the street to a competing builder and take off their hard hats and safety gear before getting to work.
Obviously, it’s a problem for builders who have strong safety programs if their safety message is contradicted by other builders who employ the same trade workers. Still, the safety message is gaining ground, said Rod Plunkett, a member of the Safety Alliance who works as a safety officer for Shea Homes. “In our last quarterly audits, we visited 11 communities involving five different builders, and we noticed two framing companies in particular were doing a great job on safety,” said Plunkett. “We like to give positive reinforcement, so we gave recognition plaques to United Production Framing for its fall-protection system and to a framer named Frank Gavlin, with R&D Framing, for having a proactive approach and making an outstanding effort.”


Last March, JLC attended a Safety Alliance training session on heat-injury prevention at the Green River Golf Club, in Corona, Calif. (see “Working Safely in Hot Weather,” Jun/17). That session was prompted by Cal/OSHA enforcement sweeps focusing on heat illness, but it turned out to be a timely topic, given the heat waves that have hit the nation this summer. In May, we went back for a training session on scaffolding—this time, the topic was prompted not by Cal/OSHA, but by the Safety Alliance’s own surveys of builder-member jobsites. JLC also went on site, to take a look at the situation in the field.
The Multi-Employer Jobsite
Scaffolding safety is a complicated management challenge for production builders. In Southern California, where cement stucco is the predominant exterior cladding, scaffolding is a necessity; it’s hard to apply three-coat stucco without scaffolding. But once the scaffolding is up, other trades on site also like to use it—for setting windows, for installing trim, for painting, and more.
In a production environment, where trade contractors—often pieceworkers—do all the actual construction, this means that multiple employers are responsible for ensuring safety on the job. OSHA, at the federal level as well as at the state level, defines most construction sites as “multi-employer job sites.” And OSHA considers all employers on the site to be responsible for safety, not just for their own employees, but often for other companies’ employees too.
In practice, this means that if an OSHA inspector sees a scaffold violation, more than one employer could face a citation and a penalty. On a multi-employer site, the rules define four classes of employer: the “creating employer”—the one that first created a jobsite hazard; the “exposing employer”—the one whose employees are exposed to danger; the “controlling employer”—the company that runs the jobsite and has actual control (such as a builder or general contractor); and the “correcting employer”—any company tasked with fixing a hazardous condition.
Scaffolding on production jobsites may be set up by specialty contractors. If they put the scaffolds up incorrectly, they could be cited as the “creating employer.” An employer such as a stucco contractor who puts his workers on the improper scaffolding could be cited as an “exposing employer.” The builder on the site, who has authority to stop the work and to order the scaffolding fixed, could be cited as a “controlling employer.” And if someone is told to fix the scaffolding, but doesn’t, he could be cited as the “correcting employer.”
But it gets even more complicated. Suppose the scaffolding is set up in full compliance, but then a sheet-metal contractor moves some planks out of his way as he sets counterflashing for a roof, and then the painter—possibly a pieceworker who’s trying to work fast—gets on the scaffold and gets to work without replacing those planks. Now the painter is the “exposing employer,” but the sheet-metal company rather than the scaffold erector is in the role of “creating employer.” But if the builder ignores an obvious violation in plain sight, it could also be cited in its status as the “controlling employer.”
In this dynamic environment, it seems pretty obvious that a busy jobsite is only going to start out safe and stay safe if the builder—the “controlling employer”—stays on the case every day. And it’s going to work best if all the builders in the area are on the same page and giving all the various trade contractors the same message: Safety matters, and everybody needs to follow the rules. And that, in a nutshell, is the mission of the Southern California Builders Safety Alliance: to send a consistent safety message to every trade employer across all the communities in the region.
Scaffolding is complicated. There are a lot of pieces and parts, and a lot of opportunities to violate the standards. There are also a lot of ways to get hurt. “I’ve been told that Cal/OSHA standards are ‘written in blood,’” Rod Plunkett told JLC. “If it’s in the standards, it’s because somebody has been hurt or killed.”
The examples mentioned here represent only a fraction of the issues that can come up with scaffolding. So if you use scaffolding, it’s worth studying the topic in greater depth. One of the best ways to learn is to work with OSHA’s consultation program, which offers expert instruction without the risk of being fined.




Base Plates
Indoors or outdoors, scaffolding requires base plates (see photos). They’re useful for leveling the legs, but they’re vital for stopping the legs of scaffolds from sinking into the soil or punching through a floor. Like any manufactured gear, they should be used according to the manufacturer’s instructions—if they come with pins and holes for connecting to the pipe scaffolding, the pins need to be set into the holes as directed.
When placed in contact with earth, the base plates need to be supported by “mud sills,” which, in California, should be at least
2 inches thick and 10 inches square, or equivalent (though a 10-inch-by-10-inch piece of 1 1/8-inch plywood is a compliant alternative).



Planks and Railings
Scaffolds come in light-duty, medium-duty, and heavy-duty types, as well as special-duty varieties for unusually heavy loads. For exterior use on a jobsite, you probably need heavy-duty scaffolding, meaning that the planks should support 75 pounds per square foot. Planks must be “scaffold grade,” which is stronger than ordinary framing lumber, particularly across the plank’s thickness. California allows heavy-duty planks to span 7 feet, but federal OSHA rules restrict that span to 6 feet, according to the U.S. Department of Labor website.
Planks should also be inspected for soundness. The photo below shows a convenient use for a plank that is no longer in good condition—it’s now being used as a toe board (toe boards are required at doorways or other access points to the building, in order to prevent anything from sliding off the platform and striking a worker below).
Scaffold working platforms need top rails and mid-rails at specified heights. Cross-bracing (also required) can serve as a rail, but in that case, the cross point of the braces must also fall within a prescribed range of heights above the working platform. You can probably count on professionally erected scaffolding to comply with those rules, but making sure the railings stay in place is another matter; in the photo below, workers have removed a mid-rail to load components onto the scaffold, creating a citable hazard.




Ties
To prevent toppling, scaffolds should be tied to the building at the scaffold ends and at intervals in between (the horizontal and vertical spacing depends on the height of the assembly). It’s a good idea to install extra ties, since some may get cut during the course of work. Superintendents on multi-employer jobsites should keep an eye out for ties that have been cut and not replaced.




Distance From the Wall
OSHA rules set a maximum allowable distance between the work platform and the wall. In California, that distance is 16 inches, although the federal requirement is 14 inches.
This rule creates practical problems when the wall being worked on has jogs or pop-outs. In those situations, outriggers may serve to get the working platform closer.
Details like these—and there are many more—would be problems to solve even on a slow-paced custom-home site where much of the work was being accomplished by the builder’s own employees. On a busy production building site, with multiple trade contractors or even multiple builders at work, the challenges are multiplied.