On the coast, the safest homes stand above the rest — on
pilings
by Clayton DeKorneDecades of storm-damage assessments clearly demonstrate the need
for more stringent foundation requirements in Coastal A
zones
(Photo by Vince Lupo)
Along the eastern seaboard and Gulf Coast, most building codes
require beachfront homes to be elevated on piling with little or no
obstruction between vertical supports. In a severe storm, an
elevated, "open" foundation will allow floodwaters to wash
underneath the first floor without putting an excessive load on the
structure and bringing down the house. Under current National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) standards, which largely dictate local
building codes in coastal communities, open foundations are
required for homes in coastal flood zones that are rated for
"velocity wave action" (V zones). This typically includes only the
first row of homes on the beach. For homes in less exposed zones,
piling foundations are widely recommended but rarely required,
despite an overwhelming body of evidence that broader application
of V-zone standards would mitigate much of the damage from storm
surge.
SOURCE OF MAXIMUM DESTRUCTION
Storm surge is a swelling of ocean levels preceding a severe storm.
The swirling winds created by hurricanes and other cyclones can
push up a dome of water as large as 50 to 100 miles wide in front
of the storm, leading to an increase in water levels ranging from 4
to 6 feet in a minor hurricane, to greater than 20 feet in big
storms (when it combines with high tide). The level of the surge
depends, in part, on the slope of the continental shelf along the
coast. The shallower the coastal waters, the more floodwaters surge
ashore. In most places, the shelf surrounding the Atlantic and Gulf
shores is relatively wide and shallow, and most of this densely
populated coastline lies less than 10 feet above mean sea level.
Consequently, the danger from storm surge is tremendous. According
to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), in nearly every
hurricane on record, storm surge is responsible for more deaths and
more property damage than any other effect of the storm, even high
winds.

In North Carolina, a 15-foot surge in front of Hurricane Floyd
flattened Oak Island's frontal sand dune, then took down homes like
the one shown on the left, which once stood on a ground-level block
foundation. Damage inspectors reported that the home likely would
have been saved if it had been elevated on piling like that shown
on the right. (Photo courtesy Dave Gatley/FEMA)
Waves can exert enormous pressures on buildings. While winds wield
pressures in the tens of pounds per square foot, a 2- to 3-foot
wave can exert pressures in the hundreds or even thousands of
pounds per square foot, says Christopher Jones, an engineer from
Durham, N.C., who wrote the current edition of FEMA's Coastal
Construction Manual-FEMA 55 (available free from FEMA;
800/480-2520). These are forces that ordinary solid walls can't
easily resist.
Despite the magnitude of the force, protection proves relatively
straightforward: Simply elevate the house above the surge. In storm
after storm, inspectors assessing damages report that homes
elevated on piling survive relatively unscathed compared to older
homes supported by solid foundations (see "Lessons Learned After
the Storm," below). Homes that are not elevated are frequently
inundated with floodwater or swept off their foundations
entirely.
A-ZONE RISKS
Post-storm assessments suggest the need for a broad redefinition of
design and construction standards in coastal A zones, but so far,
nothing public has been written into the NFIP. At issue is how
communities distinguish between places where homes must be elevated
and places where solid foundations are deemed safe.
Currently, the NFIP literally draws this distinction on Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) by specifying V zones and A zones. V
zones, which are the only zones designated high hazard areas,
include the shoreline subject to damage from waves 3 feet and
higher. In V zones, the lowest portion of the first-floor framing
must be elevated above the Base Flood Elevation, or BFE, and no
permanent enclosures are allowed below the first floor (see
"Deciphering Elevation Standards," below).
By contrast, A zones comprise areas subject to only general
flooding from the surge, but may include waves under 3 feet tall.
Under current NFIP standards, closed foundations are allowed in A
zones, as long as they include flood vents to equalize the pressure
of floodwaters, and the top of the first floor sits at or above the
base flood elevation.
The defining factor separating V zones and A zones is a 3-foot
breaking wave, which proves to be a rather arbitrary cut-off point.
Christopher Jones traces the 3-foot height standard to a study by
the Galveston District in 1975, which defined the "Critical Wave"
as "a wave possessing sufficient energy to cause major damage on
contact with conventional structures." An appendix in the study
concluded that this critical wave is a 3-foot breaking wave.
However, according to Jones, a closer reading of calculations in
the study shows that breaking waves 2.1 feet high are capable of
destroying conventional wood-frame walls and connections. In
addition, Jones reports, full-scale laboratory tests by FEMA
determined that breaking waves as low as 1 foot high consistently
cause failure of traditional stud-wall construction.
This analysis is consistent with actual storm-damage reports, as
well. Inspections following Hurricanes Hugo in South Carolina in
1989, Opal in Florida in 1995, and Fran in North Carolina in 1996,
all documented extensive wave and erosion damage in A-zone homes
that had been built in compliance with current A-zone standards.
These reports prompted investigation of the 3-foot-wave rule, which
led Jones and other floodplain managers to propose creating a
Coastal A zone — a flood zone beyond the V zone where
destructive waves less than 3 feet high are likely.
"Flood hazards in Coastal A zones are more like V zones than
riverine A zones," explains Christopher Jones. "Design and
construction requirements in coastal A zones should be more like
those in V zones, as well." Slowly, design and construction
requirements are catching on, but have yet to be fully integrated
into standards. FEMA's latest Coastal Construction Manual
identifies the Coastal A zone apart from V zone and ordinary A
zones. The manual "recommends" that foundations be built in Coastal
A zones just as those required in V zones. Namely, it stresses the
need to increase setbacks landward of the mean high-tide mark, and
the need to raise the first floor above the base flood elevation on
piling that is sized and spaced sufficiently to resist flotation,
collapse, and lateral movement.

Piling for decks and porches must be embedded to the same depth
as piling for the main structure, as shown on this home undergoing
renovation in Wrightsville Beach, N.C. Several severe storms in the
area caused excessive damage to buildings with decks or porches.
The flood forces took out shallow piles, leaving the houses
vulnerable to further damage once roof supports were gone and decks
were separated from the main structure. (Photo courtesy Dave
Saville/FEMA)
In addition, the American Society of Civil Engineer's national load
standard (ASCE 7) and flood-resistant design and construction
standard (ASCE 24) both specify V-zone load combinations in Coastal
A zones. Load combinations are an engineer's shorthand for
calculating a wide range of design loads — dead, wind, wave,
uplift, floatation, overturning, etc. All these loads must be
accounted for, but when they are tallied separately, they can lead
to an unnecessary over-design. The ASCE sets a reasonable standard
for combining loads without an excessive addition of them.
Currently, the ASCE standards are referenced in the International
Residential Code. However, in most cases they would influence the
structural design of a home in a Coastal A zone only if an engineer
were involved. So far, engineers are required to certify only
V-zone houses.
A few coastal communities have voluntarily adopted V-zone standards
in Coastal A zones — action that the NFIP rewards with lower
insurance premiums for property owners under its Community Rating
System (CRS). For example, the barrier island of Pensacola Beach in
the Florida Panhandle adopted V-zone standards for all
A-zone-mapped residential structures in Pensacola Beach in1987. The
ruling paid off in 1995 when Hurricane Opal brought a storm surge
that washed over the entire island. "We didn't lose any structures
that had been built to the code," reports Debbie Norton, manager of
the Santa Rosa Island Environmental and Developmental Services
Department, the code authority with jurisdiction over Pensacola
Beach. "Opal overwashed the entire island and took out [many] of
the older houses on solid foundations. But every new house on
piling survived."
Pensacola Beach remains an exception, at least for now. "Bottom
line," says Jones, "the widespread use of open foundations in
Coastal A zones will not occur until FEMA says, 'Do it.'"
BUILDING TO LAST
Jones and Norton stress that changing the code to account for
Coastal-A-zone hazards is just the first step. The quality of
construction ultimately matters the most. In particular, the depth
of embedment and the quality of connections between the piling and
the framing will ensure that a piling foundation can withstand the
impact of a storm. "Inspectors can only do so much," Norton
adds.
Embedment. Unlike a foundation that rests on a
footing, most driven piles support loads by friction along the
length of their sides. The embedment depth depends on the soil
characteristics, and most jurisdictions require an engineer's soil
analysis. A typical pile length for residential homes is between 20
and 60 feet.
The piling embedment specified by the engineer must account for
predicted scour, the erosion around a fixed object. If the soil
erodes around piles in a storm, the remaining embedment must still
be sufficient to resist uplift and provide lateral support.
Girders and joists. Ultimately, all loads must resolve to
the pilings by way of girders, blocking, and often, cross-bracing.
Because of the complex load paths involved and the likelihood that
the home will be tested by high winds, water, and impact from
waterborne debris, most jurisdictions require that the entire
structure be engineered.
In regions with prescriptive codes, girders supporting floors on
piling must be comprised of a minimum of two CCA-treated 2x12s
bolted together. Engineered beams, such as treated Parallam or
glulams, are often considered labor-saving alternatives. Splices in
beams are typically required over pilings.
Because of the difficulty of driving piling perfectly plumb, the
outer pilings of a foundation array are usually placed 6 to 10
inches in from the building line. This means the joists will
cantilever a short distance beyond the girders. As a rule of thumb,
the cantilever distance should never exceed the girder or joist
depth.
A home that was washed off its foundation by Hurricane Isabel
underscores the need for a strong connection between the
first-floor framing and the piling. (Photo courtesy Cynthia
Hunter/FEMA)
Since the girders are rarely on the building line and may be
slightly out of parallel, the trick is squaring the floor. A
preferred approach is to lightly tack the joists to the girders.
When all the joists are in place, the whole floor can be squared up
and then each joist fastened to the girders with hurricane ties,
such as the Simpson H6. It is easiest to install hurricane ties
before the subfloor is installed, though they can go in later. Use
only corrosion-resistant fasteners and hot-dipped galvanized nails,
and paint the edges of any custom fabricated hardware made from
galvanized steel with a cold galvanizing compound to stave off
corrosion.
Girder connections. When a piling foundation fails
in a storm, it's usually because the connection at the top of the
piling fails, which causes the house to wash off the foundation. A
strong connection between piling and girder requires a notch in the
piling and several galvanized 3/4- or 7/8-inch-diameter steel
bolts. Although it might seem easier to simply flat-cut the tops of
the pilings and use metal straps to secure the girders, this
entails the added cost of additional bolts and metal straps, plus
the added labor of drilling the extra bolt holes and cutting flat
sections on the sides of the pilings for the metal straps.
The notch for a piling-to- girder connection should not be
deeper than half the cross-section of the pile. The connections,
which must be specified by an engineer for V-zone foundations,
typically follow the bolting schedule shown at below. (Photo
courtesy JLC and Boardwalk Builders)
The most common mistake made is over-notching the pile. By code,
the depth of the notch should not exceed half the diameter of the
piling. The entire girder rarely needs to bear on the seat cut of
the notch. The engineer will often specify a bearing of about
one-third the diameter of the piling. However, occasionally there
are pilings where a deeper notch cannot be avoided — where
girders meet at corners, for instance. In this case, or when a
piling is so out of alignment that full bearing is not possible,
engineers may require a steel L-bracket to reinforce the
connection.
During Hurricane Floyd, the foundation of this Oak Island,
N.C., home failed because the homeowners nailed horizontal planks
to pilings to enclose a parking area, which increased surge forces
on the piling. Also, a section enclosed by breakaway walls had been
converted to living space, and the wiring added in the walls
prevented the walls from breaking away. (Photo courtesy Dave
Gatley/FEMA)
Piling does not have to fall perfectly on the building line.
Typically, floor joists cantilever slightly (no more than the
length of the joist depth) over the girders. The joists are
initially tacked in place so the whole deck can be squared up, and
then they are securely fastened to the girders with hurricane ties.
(Illustrations courtesy Texas Department of Insurance)
Bracing. Cross-bracing at the pilings may be
necessary to resist lateral loads from wind or water. However, the
cross-bracing may also catch debris and impede the flow of water,
increasing the load on the foundation. FEMA's Coastal
Construction Manual recommends using a larger pile and closer
spacing to allow for an increase in unbraced piling height, rather
than relying on an extensive amount of cross-bracing. If
cross-bracing is used, it's best to install it perpendicular to the
shoreline, so the bracing does not become a barrier to incoming
waves.
Grade-level enclosures. In V-zones, pilings can be
enclosed only by lattice, screen, or breakaway walls. While allowed
under NFIP standards, even the use of breakaway walls may be
illegal in some jurisdictions because they are difficult to monitor
after the house is occupied. Homeowners, anxious to maximize the
space of their high-priced properties, are often tempted to convert
enclosed areas to living space, and add wiring, plumbing,
countertops, closets, partition walls and built-ins — all of
which reduce the ability of these walls to break away easily in
surge conditions. Instead, the surge forces are transferred to the
structural piling, increasing the chances that the piling will
fail.
OWNER EDUCATION
Building on piling is no picnic. Drilling 1-inch-diameter holes
through 12 to 14 inches of piling for bolt connections 10 to 12
feet off the ground, and then cutting square notches in piling
that's anything but straight and plumb, will test the skills of the
very best builders. But in the end, the most difficult task for
contractors may be educating owners on the wisdom of increased
setbacks and more expensive engineered foundations, particularly in
Coastal A zones where they are not strictly required but where they
make perfect sense. "People tend to forget if they haven't lived
through a hurricane," explains Debbie Norton. "We don't get many
complaints anymore, not since Opal. But in places that have not
seen a major storm, tougher standards for Coastal A zones are a
hard sell."
Clayton DeKorne is editor of Coastal Contractor.